Why all the hating on 'zappers?

Why wait for 'proof' that the FDA will never allow. So many anti-zapper posters get all 'upset' because there supposedly isn't any qualified 'proof' for it killing stuff. So first proof was posted with pathogens in water, showing before and after shots--clearly there were not many anythings left alive in the water. Now (again) they seem to believe that didn't prove anything---you have to show it in a human. Which the FDA has to approve (good luck with that) and so will never be done (it costs millions of dollar and if they don't approve the study, you lose all that money). Conveniently.

And what in heck is all the ruckus about? We're talking about a hand held battery operated device that runs far less current than your average muscle simulator/tens unit. And none of them whine about those being safe. I've used the muscle simulator, and it can out right hurt, the current's so strong.

So, you have to ask yourself, why just the zapper? Being battery operated is hardly powerful enough to hurt, much less kill you. So, why all the resistance?

Suppose all of your real money making diseases are in fact really just undiagnosed parasite infestations with their infection (cancer = fungus infecting the beef liver fluke, for example) presenting symptoms that any herbalist of old would have recognized.

But of course, those, along with the midwives who would most likely have recognized the symptoms as well, are gone--run out of business by a campaign to discredit any one who isn't the 'superior' pharmaceutical trained 'doctors'.

Then, along comes these folks who discover your carefully hidden 'helpers' in your victim's body via frequency testing, and one of them invents (kinda by accident) a device that kills them all, but the eggs. OMG--this woman, this Dr. Clark could put you out of business if what she's learned gets out, especially that zapper thing.

So the big pharma campaign is started to discredit and smear the good Doc (PhD in biophysics, not starfish biology or whatever they bribed the university to change it to) and her truly helpful device, the zapper.

They pay people to make up bad stories about her both on line and anywhere she might be mentioned, and make sure she doesn't get mentioned in any of their owned press, which is just about all of them. They pay quackwatch to go after her (even though when they took her to court, the judge laughed them out of there, and wouldn't even try the case).

They pay to have disinformation agents on sites that address health issues. like curezone, to keep the zapper as 'questionable' as possible, creating doubt and causing the real people to be too afraid to try it. Isn't it weird though, how Dr. Clark never gets mentioned anywhere but the internet where they don't have much control, yet??

Really, think about it. Why are the anti-zapper crowd soooo vicious?? Could it be their jobs depend on it, pushed as it surely is, by big Pharma?? If there were if fact any thing, anything at all they could use against her, be sure she'd be all over the news. Now their only way to deal with it is by suppressing it. Tweet