"
Why wait for 'proof' that the FDA will never allow.
"
the FDA can't hide the facts
if some electric waves produced by zapper/frequencygenerator manages to kill parasitic worms inside a human body, then the FDA can forbid its use but it will still work, they can't change reality.


"
So many anti-zapper posters get all 'upset' because there supposedly isn't any qualified 'proof' for it killing stuff.
"
"
So first proof was posted with pathogens in water, showing before and after shots--clearly there were not many anythings left alive in the water.
"
A fundamental of the scientific method (to determine what is most likely true or most likely false) is to define an hypothesis, then do an experiment, then measure the results objectively, in this case Parazapper's experiment is good, but !
Another fundamental of the scientific method is that the experiment is reproduced by others people which should produce the same (or similar) results. This has not be done since Parazapper has not shared the details about the electric waves used and which organisms were damaged or not.
Also even if we assume that Parazapper's experiment demonstrates that some electric waves can kill bacterias/protozoas in a jar of water, this does not mean that any electric waves will, or that it can do the same inside a human body, or it can kills parasitic worms (which are multi cells organisms)


"Which the FDA has to approve (good luck with that) and so will never be done (it costs millions of dollar and if they don't approve the study, you lose all that money). Conveniently.
"
Not true, this can be done at home, by analyzing before/after blood, feces, mucus, containing parasitic worms or parasites eggs
The scientific method does not care about governements and agencies.


"
So, you have to ask yourself, why just the zapper? Being battery operated is hardly powerful enough to hurt, much less kill you. So, why all the resistance?
"
to not waste money and time with another useless (or poorly effective) treatment ?


"
a device that kills them all, but the eggs.
"
This would be good, unfortunately this is not true.


"
So the big pharma campaign is started to discredit and smear the good Doc and her truly helpful device, the zapper.
"
They probably don't care, they discredit themselves by exaggerating things and not providing proofs or replicable experiments. (anybody can claim anything, for exmaple i can fly in the air by using magick anf chi energy)


"
They pay people to make up bad stories about her both on line and anywhere she might be mentioned, and make sure she doesn't get mentioned in any of their owned press, which is just about all of them.
"
the world is full of bad people ! Even if i agree that there are groups of people who clearly don't want effective alternative treatments to become popular, most alternative treatments are hype or poorly effective, so there is no need to make up bad stories, they discredit themselves...


"
They pay to have disinformation agents on sites that address health issues. like curezone, to keep the zapper as 'questionable' as possible, creating doubt and causing the real people to be too afraid to try it.
"
Yes because believing everything without questioning is better ? Aren't you the one who criticizes religions ? Same approach here.