CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Opinions can be great, but only when based on all of the facts.
 
  Views: 3,457
Published: 8 y
 
This is a reply to # 2,307,517

Re: Opinions can be great, but only when based on all of the facts.


No, actually a stunned pathogen doesn't ever really recover, so it's pretty much as good as dead, she found--if it's still alive, I'm sure the range of frequencies is less but still more than a dead one so it'd be easy to tell. DDr. Clark's take on it:

"What was actually happening to the bacteria or parasites? If I could kill something as large as an Ascaris worm or intestinal fluke, then perhaps I could kill something even larger, like an earthworm or flea, something I could see with my own eyes instead of having to imagine its demise inside my body.
Ten minutes at a frequency chosen near the top of their broadcast range seemed to anesthetize them. But they didn't die. Later I checked the body bandwidth (the range of frequencies they emit) of each. The earthworms had lost a lot of their bandwidth, both at the top and bottom. The fleas seemed hardier; they had only lost a little. However they did not recover, even weeks later, from this loss." 'CFAD', page 10

And really, you trust the 'labs' owned by who knows who, over a machine if learned to use right is actually very accurate, right there in your own hand--and not paying one red cent to an outside source? Of course they want you to believe the sycrometer is inaccurate. Do you honestly think the pharmaceutical cartel wants such revealing technology in the hands of just any one?

Have you personally used one to verify the supposed 'inaccuracy' of it? I have and while I never got the slides for stuff, I did learn to use it and could determine if water was clean or contaminated by gas, Vitaman C and a few other soluble things I had sitting around. The resonance happens at the right frequency--there's no way to to fake that. The biggest issue was making sure to test all the frequencies that might be involved--not just one. I had someone put stuff in the water for me, so it was a blind test and they put a couple things in several of them, so I learned to test for what else might be in there besides the first thing I found.

If folks used this technology, there would be no way toxins could be covertly added to food/drugs/supplements/personal care items, no way they could deny the water being contaminated, etc. because the proof would be there, right in the complainant's hand. And you don't think the 'elites' or at least the cartel wouldn't want this technology buried as deep as possible?
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.172 sec, (2)