>- a lab confirmed what things died when subjected to what frequency, right? So her methodology and Rife's weren't the same. Her work was done by her finding the frequencies with her sycrometer which gave her an immediate answer if whatever thing was now dead.
Yes, lab testing is far superior because the synchrometer can give completely false readings. For example, a microbe can be stunned so badly that it does not resonate but it is not actually dead so that it recovers and becomes functional again after a while. I have actually observed this under the microscope.
It is extremely important to actually verify the actual death of what you are zapping and the synchrometer can be easily fooled.