Re: I agree!

Your thinking (assuming the post above had anything to do with any of my posts at all), is based on a perception of what you believe.

I HAVE NEVER indicated (that I can recall) that the REASON the officials are banning Lugol's from the marketplace is because of Curezone OR because of the threat of their $600-$900 billion dollar cancer revenues. I have ALWAYS said it was because of meth.

>>>as for the feds controlling the drug trade, etc. who knows? but that wasn't the issue here at all.<<< Well, it's just silly to not correlate the two and consider the ramifications.

The fact that 'they' could very easily control meth production WITHOUT denying humanity the ability to easily heal cancer should be a strong consideration for anyone that is debating sincerely.

The fact that the 'war on Iodine for meth making' started around the same time as Abraham was researching/publishing his Iodine truths is also of MAJOR consideration.

The "war on drugs" (as presented by the authorities) is a total farce (again, of course, only to anyone who cares enough to examine the facts BEFORE creating an opinion). The $600-$900 billion dollar revenue from cancer in relationship to the THOUSANDS OF KILOS of cocaine that have been 'confiscated' and then magically disappear, is MORE than worthy of note.

Oh yeah, they burn a bale of marijuana or two occasionally to impress upon the sheeple how they 'dispose' of illicit drugs. But the cocaine? that's worth hundreds (even thousands) of billions of dollars? It provides the money to fund anything and everything they desire...and it's TOTALLY unaccounted for.

To remove Iodine (that cures cancer) and claim the 'war on drugs' to be reason --when the 'war on drugs' is nothing but smoke and mirrors (except to the sheeple) is most certainly something that should be considered and brought to light.