Re: Questions regarding Essiac's original formula and dosage
"It's more complicated than what can be learned in
one week of taking essiac. It's watch, listen, learn, read, research, brew, and
do --"
Well, I've been looking into Essiac for at least 10 years, and researching it
more intently in the past few months. It hasn't been a one week affair.
We are in a discussion of the original recipe for the tea and that should be
beneficial for each of us, and for those who read the cancer support
forum. It isn't like discussing chemotherapy vs. radiation therapy.
"I again disagree with you regarding four herb
essiac. This is merely my opinion and not to be taken personally. To each his
own essiac formula. There is no need to quote the book to me, as I have read it
and formed my opinion, not based on only one book or two books, but several and
much in-depth research. One of the disheartening aspects of the essiac protocol
is wading through the unfortunate "essiac wars" and conflicting
information."
I agree to disagree. However, in the post that I was responding to you
wrote:
"I have accumulated quite a library of books on
essiac, including "Essiac: Rene Caisse's Herbal Pharmacy". Rene Caisse
did indeed work with Dr. Charles Brusch and together they developed an eight
herb formula, including four potentiating herbs, which make the four core herbs
more effective..."
As a foundation of your point of view that Essiac is an eight herb tea, you
refer to "Essiac: Rene Caisse's Herbal Pharmacy" which doesn't have a
single statement in support of eight herbs. In fact, it does nothing but
support the four herb recipe! If you are presenting that as a part of your
research to support eight herbs, you can't - because, it doesn't!
Your history of Essiac is mixing apples and oranges. Yes, I'm fully
aware of how Rene came into the recipe. The inference that the original
formula came from a Canadian Ojibwa Shaman, Medicine Man is just that, an
inference. There is no supporting evidence of where it came from.
That part of the story is pure unsupported fantasy.
"Rene Caisse worked with several M.D.s in her
early career using essiac, in her middle years and later. One of them was Dr.
Charles Brusch and she visited his clinic in Massachusetts several times and
stayed there for lengthy periods."
You are mixing things together that do not belong together. Yes, in
Rene's cancer clinic, she worked under the direction of MDs and she didn't
charge any fees. That was in order to circumvent Canadian laws against
practicing medicine without a license. She closed her clinic in the 1940s,
long before Brusch ever came into the picture. After early experiments
with an eight herb formula, Rene settled on the four herb recipe and had
remarkable results with this formula during several years work in her cancer
clinic.
Her contact with Brusch didn't come about until much later and while she did
visit him, but how much they worked together is a matter of wild
speculation. In the above book that you referenced (me too) the co-author
of the book was an associate of Brusch for 14 years during which time she had
access to the detailed correspondence between Brusch and Caisse, and
McPherson. The co-author in the statement that I copied said there is no
evidence that Brusch ever had any knowledge of the formula. Rene was very
secretive in all she worked with and never gave the formula to anyone. She
always prepared the tea and brought the prepared tea to the research
facilities. When the brew ran out, they had to contact her for more.
Your other statement that she and Brusch "developed" a formula is
completely without supporting evidence. That she worked closely with him
is also very suspect as in the books that I've read he (Brusch) treated her very
distantly, if at all, and she did not spend a great deal of time with him.
In fact, she left soon after beginning that association because he wanted to
make the formula there and she refused to give it to him. They talked on
the telephone from time to time but from what her associates relate about that
is that Brusch treated her as an inferior and was only after the formula, which
he never got . Brusch and/or his associates have made a wild, wild
statement that she worked with him for 20 years and that is a flat out
lie. All you have to do in following the story is to recognize that Brusch
has an ego of immense proportions and his claim and the claim of any of his
associates that he perfected a blend is utter nonsense and cannot be
supported. In fact, even before I read the above book it became apparent
to me that those who are pushing the eight herb tea using Brusch's name are
charging horrible prices and suggesting mega doses for one reason and one reason
only, to make lots of money.
I am very much aware of the history that you have presented but wished to
make the above comments regarding Brusch's role and the four vs. four herb
variety.
Regarding the Indian vs. Turkey rhubarb, you can go the following link and
read about it near the bottom of the page. Whether the original formula
included Indian rhubarb or not, is highly questionable and not supportable.
http://www.motherearthherbs.com/rhubarb.html
"I doubt that Rene Caisse said that one only needs
to take 1 oz. at bedtime for all patients across the board. I do not necessarily
trust the word of Sheila Snow, as I know her to be wrong in her reporting of
other facts. 1 oz. at bedtime is NOT the directions of all essiac manufacturers
that I know."
Always doubt what doesn't fit what you believe. She cured many cancer
cases with one ounce a day. One ounce at bedtime may not be the directions
of the Essiac manufacturers you know, but where did they get their dosage?
The higher the dosage, the greater their sales.
"Burdock grows wild in many places on the North
American continent, including the mountains and surrounding areas of Lake Tahoe,
all over Canada, and is prolific in states like Wisconsin. It grows on the
roadside and in people's backyards, very common."
Yes, it does now. But it didn't arrive in North America until European
settlers brought it here in the 16th Century or later, probably mixed with the
seeds they brought for farming. It is not a native plant.
"If you do not believe the story of origination
that a Canadian Ojibwa Shaman showed the local herbs to a woman with breast
cancer and that patient eventually relayed the herbal information to Rene Caisse
-- there is not much point in taking essiac at all. Turkey Rhubarb has replaced
the original Indian Rhubarb common to North America because it is medicinally
more potent and has been used as a potent medicine in Asia and China going back
in history for many dynasties. So, there have been changes to the original
formula for the good. I would not get hung up on taking the original formula
only. The more you read, you will understand why."
I do not doubt the story that it originated with a shaman, but I seriously
doubt if the specific tribe and/or medicine man can ever be verified. It
simply can't. I do doubt the Indian to Turkey rhubarb
transformation. There is no supporting evidence for it whatsoever.
What is completely missing in all of this discussion and in everything in
print, is the healing powers of Rene Caisse. Yes, the tea can heal, but so
can healers. How much of a factor she was in working directly with the
cancer patients in their recovery is an unknown factor. The greatest
healing agent on the planet is - the human spirit. A healer (spirit)
working with a person (spirit) who wants to be healed. Each one of us a
spirit in a body, and when we become in touch with out spiritual aspects we can
accomplish many things. If you have read any of Bernie Siegel's books you
will know that he treated some cancer patients without medication of any kind,
and some of them healed. There were many who were in the healing process
and lost their faith and regressed. If you don't wish to heal, nothing can
be done for you. Also, most people fail to recognize that death is a
healing too. It is but a transition.
Keep up with your research. Keep your faith and keep healing and I'll
do the same.