Re: Is Anyone Familiar with Dianos-Tech Labs........

"
My wife sent in a three day stool sample of her Bm's to Kaiser Permenente and in that sample was a large fat worm ( there was no doubt), and the results were negative for the worm. Maybe it might be necessary to get your fat worm, take it down to the actual lab where the tests are done and gently place it on the lab tech's plate during his/her lunch period and ask "is this or is this not a worm".
"

That isn't likely to work either: Already been tried. A patient took a WORM, read it right, a W O R M (not 'something' or a structure under a slide that resembled a worm but a real animal which I saw [and later grew myself]) to a bunch of m.d.s and they wouldn't agree on different things, some of them being if it was in fact a worm or if it had indeed come out from the patient to begin with. One of the lab person's opinion was that it was a worm collected right off the ground. They said that the stool couldn't be inspected because it could have been 'contaminated by the environment' and whatnot. Then they started some medical arguments about something else and dismissed the patient home.

This was told to me by the patient and HIS FAMILY themselves. Afterwards I examined the specimen and it looked like a worm to me BECAUSE IT WAS. How could anyone not see something this obvious? I took the specimen which of course was dead at least by that time and I was able to extract ova from it and the samples grew apparently the same species. I examined the patient's stool microscopically and it showed evidence of structures quite similar to the worm and the ova I had collected. I was able to grow apparently the same species from the ova collected from the stool. What more evidence would be needed, I ask?