Re: Trolls - beware the light of science
It is my place to judge. And I can determine your reasoning is faulty by the arguments you make. If the arguments you used to defend and justify your position are flawed, the basis for your conclusion is also flawed.
It is not impossible that you might have gotten lucky and come to the correct conclusion, based on flawed reasoning, but because your reasoning is flawed you have no way of knowing, or correcting yourself. The standards of logic and reason are well known, so are the standards for making intelligent arguments; arguments free of fallacies. In both cases you fail. They are also not 'my standards', but methods that have been in development for well over 2000 years.
I use the same dababases and read the same journals as everybody else, the information is not hidden. But I also do not make the logical error of dismissing data because I do not like the source, or the source of the funds.
I assess the information on its basis, and subsequent supporting evidence.