Re: Update! Eyesight improving, and general improvements with some side effects from Iodine and Borax protocols

I agree. The first person to call the other a name in an argument is the loser. You lost when you resorted to calling me a disruptor. Thanks for acknowledging this fact.

The Nazis were notorious for claiming that Jewish people were doing to them what in fact they were doing to Jewish people. This is exactly what you have done in this thread. That is a fascistic tactic.

Anyone with greater than a two-digit I.Q. reading this thread knows I doled out some Science and you got emotional about it. It's obvious when you compare your demeanor to mine. I have remained rational and calm and you have not.

What do vaccines, fluoride, or bromide have to do with this discussion? This is an example of your projection. You claim that I cannot remain on topic, yet you have bounced around from history of the Iodine forum to how long it takes a message to have an effect on the internet to vaccines to the other halogens. I suggest that it is you who has the problem of not staying focused.

As for what I actually think of those three things, vaccines are both good and bad. Vaccines have been enormously beneficial in the fight against infectious disease but have also caused problems because of side effects and a lack of efficacy, especially in the case of flu vaccines. Fluoride is moderately bad, sure. Bromide is much more toxic than fluoride. I have worked around bromide for years and am aware of its toxicity. However, asserting that each of these things is "far worse" than retinol is simply an unsubstantiated claim.

As far as whether it is a better use of my time to warn people about those things, this is just a nonsensical statement. That's like saying "well, HIV is far worse than the flu, so we shouldn't waste our time warning people about the flu." That simply makes no sense. Tweet