So how do you reconcile the fact that Ezekial's temple describes there being an absence of evil where God dwells forever with animal sacrifices also done in the temple, if you are taking that vision literally? Animal sacrifices being done in the presence of Jesus who had made the ultimate once for all sacrifice for sin sounds pretty evil to me.
Without the fourth temple idea, I think you'll have even more problems trying to fit in Ekekial's vision in a literal way, especially since you said you are against the rebuilding of the temple, which goes back to my original question: Why are you against it, if Ekekial's temple vision sounds good in so many ways, such as God dwelling there forever? Other pre-mill believers sound excited about the temple, and I think that is because they see it as good according to Ekekial's vision. I know you said you haven't applied Ezekial's vision but I think it's an important aspect of the pre-mill view that has to be explained somehow. Even Michelle Bachmann said in the video this thread was started with, that we need to be paying attention to Ezekial's visions right now because she believes they are getting closer to unfolding literally.