Re: This is a good article if you have hang ups either way.

There's nobody left to convince. According to the moderator, I won the debate. you resorted to personal attacks.  "Personal attack is often the best indication that the writer knows his logic is flawed and therefore tries to deflect attention by attacking the opponent."

You just did it again. "Challenge the message and not the messenger". You can't help it.

Regarding what you call "fraternizing". I've been exchanging messages with you too. Who I choose to reply to in an open forum, doesn't make me guilty of that person's actions. I'm exchanging messages with you too. Why not copy and past some of your personal attacks on me into your message if you're now going to call me a hypocrite? Yes, you just called me a hypocrite. And you scolded me by saying "don't show me your bias next time". What the hell does that mean?

You called me illiterate for no reason except that you didn't hava a response to my points. I've been making points and getting none back. Why should I continue to waste my time with your interrogation? Give me your scientific proof that AF does not exist. Give me your proof that Candidiasis does not exist. Give me your proof that "most" people who have the symptoms of AF are in fact under-eating.  It's fine to cite quotations and articles, but put your own logic behind the citations.

Furthermore, my debate along with your personal credibility attacks, aren't helping anyone because there's seemingly no audience here, and if there is an audience, they're only reading for amusement.

I've learned a lot from curezone and the open minded community here. I've been here on and off almost since its inception. I want to continue to learn and my time is too valuable to waste.