CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: immunosuppressive, not in dispute...
 
  Views: 3,662
Published: 14 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,596,367

Re: immunosuppressive, not in dispute...


I agree completely, and am glad that you are at least open to the possibility that there are different ways of looking at this issue. if what marshall is saying is correct, than, for a significant subset of the population, supplementing with vitamin d without rectifying the underlying disease process, is seriously harmful. given all the links I provided that discuss the close simmilarity between the structure of d2 or d3 and a steroid, it pays to look at this closely, and not assume that simply by artifically raising 25d levels in the body long term good has been achieved. none of the studies go out far enough, and most deal with short term benefits that you might expect to see from steroidal suppression of the immune system/inflamation. and though Chris discounts my own personal experience, it is exactly the reason why I am so adamant about this. it is a real problem that is being ignored and papered over. by the time some people figure this out, the damage will have been done.

John
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.391 sec, (1)