CureZone   Log On   Join
immunosuppressive, not in dispute...
 
  Views: 3,838
Published: 14 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,596,124

immunosuppressive, not in dispute...


would have thought you would know that vit d is immunosuppressive. not really in dispute, plenty of Science out there:

http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6071897/claims.html


http://www.springerlink.com/content/hrq78p32hwj4t905/


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/04/090408164415.htm


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080125223302.htm


http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/abstract/125/6_Suppl/1704S


first one is really interesting. note is suggests using vit d to suppress the immune system only where the patient's immune system has not been compromised.... can anyone guess why that is? i think you know why....

John
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.219 sec, (1)