Re: might be true for some, but not others. do your homework people, get tested first...

John,
OK. Let's get to the nitty gritty.

To clarify.......
I have never suggested or commented that anyone should (blindly) supplement with Vitamin D3, until they have already established their vitamin D status by a 25 OHD test.
On that basis, and that basis alone, can an individual decision be made as to whether supplementation is necessary.

The information I have posted on concerning Vitamin D is supported by no other than 30+ Scientists, who mostly all came to the same conclusion independently of each other.

The hole in your argument is that during the time of year when sunshine is plentiful, and people sunbathe liberally, our bodies will manufacture between 20,000ius and 50,000ius per day, to a maximum limit self-determined by the body itself.
This being the case, then these people (according to your information) will be doing themselves irreparable harm. But where is the evidence and the proof of this harmful sunlight-exposure, as you claim that the Vitamin D Receptors (VDR's) in many people are blocked?
Perhaps you would like to enlighten us?

However, in comparison, when sunlight is absent for long periods of time, and sunlight exposure is impossible, then supplementation (of this natural substance of cholcalciferol) would be required if the levels of 25 OHD drop below what is accepted as a normal level determined by Nature.

BTW, harmful bacteria can only take a foothold within the body, if the bodily medium provides an environment for them to exist: this is known as toxemia. A toxemic-free body does not allow pathogens of any description (including invading bacteria) to be made manifest, and the reason I have never had a days illness of any description within the last 30 years.

I have yet to discover any scientific literature/studies that explains or even recognizes a VDR'S blockage, despite hours upon hours of research within scientific journals and elsewhere.
You have also yet to explain in any detail whatsoever, the methodology for this, except the "kinesiology test kit" your Doctor used, and an absent scientific explanation means that I remain extremely skeptical of your assertions.

Please explain by what method your health-professional determined that your VDR pathway and receptors were blocked, and only then would I have to reconsider my position.

Chrisb1.




Tweet