CureZone   Log On   Join
Don't use Essaic alone for cancer
 
Dquixote1217 Views: 12,355
Published: 16 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,081,813

Don't use Essaic alone for cancer


You have already gotten a couple of good replies on where to obtain or make proper Essaic.  My very strong advice is to NOT use Essaic alone to fight cancer.  Essaic is a very good cleanser and detox agent to incorporate in an overal cancer fighting protocol, such as the one I listed in this post: http://curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1081775#i

However, when it comes to an actual cancer fighting agent, I have to agree with my esteemed good friend Webster Kehr who runs the excellent Cancertutor.com website, who says that he lists it as a stage 3 treatment, but only when combined with other true cancer fighting agents, and that while he would not hesistate to incorporate it in an overall protocol because of it's cleansing abilities, he would never use it himself or recommend it to anyone as a sole cancer fighting item.

(And if anyone doubts what I am saying, I would be happy to produce Webster's email message to that effect, or you can simply email him yourself)

Two other cancer fighters with very high credentials in my book, South African Marc Swanepoel (who formulated the Sutherlandia OPC anti-cancer and HIV supplement) and Doctor Michael Goebels, both of whom are also members of my Yahoo Oleandersoup forum which has helped save a great many cancer victims, also agree with Webster and myself about Essaic: very good stuff, but far from the best natural and alternative cancer fighter.

DQ

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.098 sec, (1)