Re: Contrarian versus libertarian?

"Since we have not YET had our right to move and to live wherever we decide taken away by the federal goverment, those who took serious issue with any laws passed in their states would be free to move to those states whose laws they preferred."

In your view, everyone affected by draconian laws passed in their state if Ron Paul succeeds in destroying federal civil rights protections can just up and move elsewhere, regardless of jobs, health or family ties? Pretty unrealistic.

"And secondly, there is much, much more at stake here than just health freedoms, and you seem as clueless about that issue as you are about mainstream vaccination propaganda. I have to wonder what those who latch onto issues such as his personal beliefs about taking away the entire potential life of an unborn child would think if the one world order crowd of elitists ultimately wins, and forces their declared goals of depopulating the planet down to 500 million servants by such measures as genocide and denying the surviving women the right to even have children by way of forced abortions and sterilizations."

Ah, so we need Ron Paul to save us from the black helicopters and the Illuminati? Thanks for clarifying that.

By the way, here's another source regarding Ron Paul and his views on civil liberties, which confirms what the author of the original article was saying.


http://civilliberty.about.com/od/profiles/ig/2008-Republican-Candidates/Ron-P...