Since the willingness to ignore the government's intention to work out schemes against society is shortsighted, and because ignoring the possibility cannot be justified as reasonable, mockery of the possibility of a Conspiracy is to be expected (because there is no defense for ignoring the possibility).

The American people are being expected to believe that a person who chooses to go to college (in order to prepare for a future), changed their mind and committed suicide after realizing that their true desire was to kill people.

We are also expected to believe, that after the first shooting, Cho remembered that he had forgotten to make some audio visual materials and write (they weren't already written, lousy planning,...even though he wrote plays) letters and collect past writings in order to mail a package all the way to NEW YORK (National T.V., slipped his mind, too much DRAMA happening), so he quickly got on the ball, went home and got the address for NBC in New York, made the AV material, wrote numerous pages, ran to the post office (the line was short), went home and got chains for the doors, installed the chains without being noticed (noisy chains, but there was no one around to hear or notice, even though there were pick-up trucks on the university grounds when shots were heard).

Of course, Cho was born before he went to Virginia Tech and has a 23 yr. history of "living"/existence and a small history of requiring "assistance", but all of a sudden the media decides to ignore all of that. The media instead shows us a total of about .5 of 1% of the AV materials and about .2 of 1% of everything this DRAMA student ever wrote (the 2 plays only).

Cho was smart in choosing not to take a course for hopeless, suicidal killers, but instead chose a DRAMA course so that he would have a good future, but he could have made a better choice than to send his package to NBC in NEW YORK (why NBC? does the gov't. favor NBC as more trustworthy of slanting the news because of all the Homeland Security in NY?).


http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2007/200407standdown.htm


http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1263



http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=103056

(there are no conspiracies and no information is kept from the American people unless the gov't. decides otherwise).

36,

What reason do you have for wanting to discredit Conspiracy theories? Why do you mock? If Conspiracy theories really were as you believe (ridiculous), then you would have no reason to mock, you could simply tell us the truth and provide SOLID evidence to prove how silly the theories are.

But instead, you mock while distracting the other person from requesting evidence.

Challenge:

Acknowledge and justify Operation Northwoods. Tell us how silly the theory about the fake moon landing is even though the Parkes Radio (different reports, but all agree the transmission was "tricky") Telescope in Australia was supposed to recieve the video signals and had high winds cause a malfunction.


http://www.answers.com/topic/parkes-observatory


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkes_Observatory


http://www.public-action.com/911/northwds.html


http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/


There are dozens of other conspiracies that have been documented, but you don't need this explained to you, it is common sense that people are usually in competition with each other and that the gov't. also is going to scheme against the people. Since you fear the possibility that somebody else might know more than you on a particular subject, you seek to discredit the discussion and blatantly AND shamelessly add nothing to the discussion except mockery.