Re: Title Edited from what it was, to:"Windage" EDITED
>>I wasn't aware it bothered you so much. If there isn't a specific posting of mine that you have a concern with, then why do you write so much ?<<<
Good heaven and Lawd Awmighty...I can't remember a "specific" postings, but I certainly can remember reading posts of yours, the threads, and going back and seeing that you'd changed your posts without noting it - enough times to start making a mental note of it.
The first time one say's to oneself, "that's odd, not like how I perceive V at all, maybe I missed something...whatever"; the second/third time, "Hmmm, "wonder whassup with doing that?"; the subsequent times, "Well, after all that ML bashing, V's doing one of the things that ML does that irritates people highly? and he's confusing things and making himself look bad/ML-ish" ...and then I'm in the debate forum today and someone else mentions that THEY noticed it, and I posted that I agreed, along with comments.
Sheesh, shoot me now for not having a photographic memory and noting things that others noted, as well.
>>>In fact, I even sent YOU one message on the zeta water about 2-3 weeks ago, in response to your expression that one of my earlier posting was gone from the meltdown or modified. EDIT _ I EVEN GAVE YOU MORE THAN WHAT WAS IN THE ORIGINAL POSTING. You didn't even thank me.<<<
The first line of my response to that email? (which my log shows you received)
>>>Thank you SO much for responding :)<<<
And whether you did or whether you didn't read/note my response, that STILL doesn't have anything to do with my original post here regarding back-editing without notation.
I've been commenting publicly on issues on a public forum...and you're bringing PERSONAL EMAILS INTO THIS? An email about Zeta Water has NOTHING to do with how you've back-edited your posts without notation (which maybe you're forgetting -?- seemed QUITE clear that you admitted doing - as I showed the links/words for in a previous post).
>> My questions aren't answered , but instead I'm attacked for reasons unrelated to the debate.<<
I've answered every question you had to the best of my ability; I can't do better than that.
Unrelated? I've been commenting on your editing posts without notating it in the header; that's the only thing I've commented upon to you, so that is the only possible topic to be related to.
>>I'd drench and throw my leftover kelp at ya, but it's in the trash with all the other waste.<<
Lovely closing line - good luck to you, too.
Unyquity