Re: Title Edited from what it was, to:"Windage"

>>back-editing of your past posts and altering them to 'near 180s' <<

See the conundrum? I cannot possibly "show you a single post"... of 'post-changes' that I've read & noted several times, because the posts were edited without notation.

My concern is with the fact...(seemingly admitted )


//www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=874255#i

>>>The proper internet protocol for editing posts is to mark them as "edited" in the title line and then noting exactly what you edited.<<<



//www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=874267#i

>>>If your interpretation of protocol is different than mine with regards to editing messages, then I respect the diversity of your opinion.<<<

...that you edit your posts without notation, how it affects the thread, and people seeking knowledge, etc...NOT that you add to your knowledge and/or change your opinion.

Your choice, your posts, your words (edited or not). My only concern was that it may confuse/harm people's opinion of you OR their opinion of the posters in the rest of the thread that look 'upside down' once the original post has been altered without editing. And in doing that, it causes others to disregard or be skeptical to future good information from you.

V, quite frankly I don't get it at all. Back-editing posts without notation is something that I was sure I'd seen you rail against ML for doing...perhaps you never have taken issue with ML for that (?)

Either way, it would seem obvious that you wouldn't want to do something that ML was notorious for (and irritates/d people to a frazzle)...yet it seems (two links above) that back-editing without notation is a 'protocol' to which you subscribe.

I guess I'm 'all done this'...I've said what I thought was worth saying - you've done the same. If I've missed anything of importance or there's anything you want to clarify to me (or others), post it or email me privately...and I'll respond as soon as I can.

I'm off to work and then to sleep.

Unyquity