Re: The Evolutionist Pseudoscientific Method

Haven't seen Grog in awhile, but based on the content of this forum alone, he probably loathes me.

My challenge to evolution is not on religious grounds. It's on scientific ones. I want Science to advance to know the truth about it, taking into account all available evidence, not cherry picking it or believing in evolution in spite of all the ACTUAL scientific evidence which suggests that something else is going on.

Both sides are behaving very similarly, and we can never find out the real truth as long as both sides are fixedly maintaining their positions in spite of all the evidence against them. Calling actual evidence "psuedoscience" is a lot like calling contradictory creation accounts "truth" -- they're self-imposed ignorance. And it doesn't matter which side invents material (or asserts the existence of evidence that "we just haven't found yet"); in both cases, they're engaging in wishful thinking.

So, I sit in the unenviable position of challenging BOTH sides at the same time. Only, the evolutionists are a lot touchier about it for some reason...