Re: Faceless interactions

If I were not so firmly against the entire detrimental voting procedure I would certainly vote a "yes" on your previous post.

Another depressing symptom of CureZone is the compulsion to form alliances with some whilst waging wars against others. It is expected that discussion may arise which might very well involve dispute or difference of opinion, but we all should be mature and responsible enough to realise that the dispute is not with the person in his or her entirety but with one or two of their views (which are not "right" or "wrong", simply different from our own perceptions). It appears that some CureZone members hold grudges and consistently make it their business to argue with, mock and harrass those on their "sh*t-list" whilst maintaining their internet-war relationship with their allies. I freely admit that I have had discussions with others that could be construed as being "negative", but this does not mean that one must seek to undermine the other at every given opportunity. It is discussion and dispute (and more importantly, alternate viewpoints) that helps us grow as individuals and become sympathetic, empathetic and understanding towards others and their beliefs. Were these anomalies not to exist we would be nothing more than government-controlled, emotionless clones...is this not what we are all fighting against, together, as one?