Re: Explanation

Should blog owners be allowed to attack other members of curezone?

yes

Should blog owners be allowed to attack people who are not members of curezone, but are respected by other members of CureZone?

yes

Should blog owners be allowed to attack public people, like politicians, or other people in public light, if those people are respected by other curezone members?

yes

Where would you draw the line of what is allowed, and what is not?

let the person who owns the blog speak for themself

Should blog owners be allowed to attack George Bush, if there are other members of curezone who disagree with such messages? If blog owners are allowed to attack George Bush, should other members of curezone who disagree with such messages be allowed to attack the blog owners?

only on blogs

Or, should we create a rule that nobody is allowed to talk negative about anyone, and choose to delete any and every message where someone is attacking someone?

blogs should be seperate from forums.

Where would you draw the line of what is allowed, and what is not?

arent there laws governing that?


Why am I asking you those questions? Cause I don't know the answer. I want to hear your opinion. I need good brain storming on those questions.

Where to draw the line on what is allowed on CureZone, and what is not.

How much freedom should blog owners have?

full control of what they write and accept any and all feedback

Should curezone moderators be allowed to hide and delete messages of blog owners?

no

Should curezone moderators be allowed to block blog owner, if they already have a history of conflict with that blog owner?

no




the only thing governing what goes on in blogs should be your own legal protection. otherwise, why have blogs if the same rules apply to them as to forums? the name on the blog says it all - wysiwyg Tweet