Re: Hulda Clark reputation damaging

Can't follow the thread arrangement, eh? Sorry, thought a smart guy like you wouldn't be so handicapped.

It was meant for applxperience. Did that help? Yeah, I'm sure playing along with the 'science' name game would give you the chance to bring out all the 'science' debunking cut and pastes, eh?

My observation aren't about Science though. It's an obversation about the meta-level mind control game. Like trying to use Science to prove how many layers of frequencies there are. It only measures as far as the equipment can. And observations/opinions aren't really measurable, are they? Documentable perhaps, but not measurable.

Science is totally fallible--dependent on the methodology used (no guarantees there), the accuracy (none there either), the researcher themselves' integrity (that very definitely has no guarantee, as those folks can easily be influenced by threats of censure/blacklisting etc. or threats of bodily harm to self and loved ones). So no, 'science' is just another level of the scam. Sorry. Tweet