Re: Hulda Clark reputation damaging

>- it is easy to understand why what is allowed to be stated as fact must be backed up by some proofs.

Yes, agreed, but when proof exists, it is still overwritten.

Even when they are plainly in error, it is over written

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Rife
"Consider this statement: An analysis by Electronics Australia found that a typical 'Rife device' consisted of a nine-volt battery, wiring, a switch, a timer and two short lengths of copper tubing, which delivered an "almost undetectable" current unlikely to penetrate the skin."

Sorry, not a Rife machine, that is a Hulda Clark Zapper. A gross misrepresentation of the truth.

Also, many of their claims are from Stephen Barrett, A highly prejudicial and unreliable source who has lost lawsuits over false claims.



Tweet