Hulda Clark reputation damaging

Is there anyone who cares how mentions of Hulda Clark are purposely damaging Hulda Clark image, meaning someone is investing dirty techniques and time to do it.

One example I came across with today:

The Wikipedia page for " Hulda Clark " in Norwegian, shows in its search results a piece of text which is NOT even in the body of the entry (priority is first 200 words of an article, not including the asides or footer) and includes the word "criminal" in it, along with the title of a book which IS NOT EVEN IN NORWEGIAN language!

There's no easier example of manipulated search results and reputation damage.

The cached page that shows in search results is here:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Nok90EBgwxsJ:no.wikipedi...


and this is the normal page:
http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hulda_Regehr_Clark


Time ago I came across with the Wikipedia page for "Lung Cancer" (or something that serious about smoking, sorry I don't remember exactly) showing "Marlboro" in the search results, and even with its sub-pages and everything!

They told me it was in the "Lede" which nobody has access to, so there's still ways for Wikipedia to be biased (obviously for money)

Burzynski exposed one of them in the last movie, getting paid thousands by labs to write with fake names… I hope someone do the same, and reminding people that the Mars Rovers Curiosity uses a syncrometer to find life inside the rocks in Mars! (they even played the Happy Birthday live with the frequency generator! Tweet