CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Moving Glaxony's "liver flush debate"
 
Hveragerthi Views: 2,567
Published: 12 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,940,426

Re: Moving Glaxony's "liver flush debate"


you say "the fact that real gallstones are not "rubbery" but rather calcified"


do you think they miraculously materialize as rocks completely calcified?
or does some kind of sludge have to sit in there for years fossilizing?

Should I go back and pull up all your posts where you also admit that it takes years for real gallstones to grow?  Seems like now you are trying to back peddle on those claims since you have lost every other argument so far and need a new angle.

it seems like your argument is similar to "an acorn isn't a tree"
and i would agree

I don't see how.  An acorn is simply a seed that may or may not grow in to a tree.  But the tree, like gallstones, is slow to grow.  And like the acorn is not the tree, the sludge is not the gallstone.  To be called a stone the material must be of a certain size.  And as they grow real gallstones calcify, so they are not rubbery but rather hard.  And their grinding against each other makes them faceted, not round as you described yours.

Of course you have mentioned cutting your "rubbery balls" of saponified oil open and seeing rings.  This would indicate that they were of significant size.  This if they were real gallstones they would have been hard and faceted and not round and rubbery.

all people have to do is get a sonogram and make sure they don't have a
ROCK before flushing and you have no problem with it???

Spud did that then did the "liver flush".  She still passed the same rubbery balls.  Why?  Because they are saponified oil formed in the intestines, not real gallstones.

Let's go to the web master right now and have him post this:

EVERYONE BE SURE TO GET A SONOGRAM TO MAKE SURE YOU DON'T HAVE A ROCK IN YOUR GALL BLADDER OR LIVER BEFORE FLUSHING IF YOU WANT TO COMPLETELY ELIMINATE THE RISK OF ONE GETTING STUCK ON IT'S WAY OUT

Then would you get off everyone's case?

Again I ask, why is it the "liver flush" supporters are so scared to have the facts presented to people?  If they really had evidence that what they were passing were real gallstones then they would be presenting it everywhere they can find.  This is not happening though.  Why?  Because "liver flushing" is a scam.  

Am I going to keep reporting on this scam? Definitely.  So those who are willing to listen to the real evidence can choose for themselves what to believe and if they really want to get in to poop picking as a spare time hobby.

I am surprised that so many people fall for this scam anyway.  I mean think about it.  Anyone knowing much of anything about the body will realize that the ingestion of oil contracts the gallbladder, not the liver.  Therefore, if anything it should be called a gallbladder flush. So these people are taking advice from someone who came up with this garbage who did not even know the difference between the liver and the gallbladder!

Even the fact that people are claiming to pass stones larger than the maximum diameter of the ducts, or in volumes hundreds of times larger in volume than the gallbladder itself should tell people something.  But it seems like some people won't take the time to stop and think about it or at least use some simple common sense.  Someone claims they passed gallstones the size of a golf ball and people fall for it even though it is impossible.  These are the same type of people who also believe they won the Nigerian Lottery.

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.125 sec, (3)