Re: Cholesterol stones

 You're right. It seems this guy doesn't want to tackle any real questions but prefers to speak down to everyone as some kind of authority figure yet totally unscientific and un experienced in his personal dogma.
For someone who claims to have debunked these cleanses he certainly hasn't done so today. When people claim that the discussion is over you know they can't hold up their end of the discussion.

I find it interesting how you keep repeating yourself over and over even though what you are saying is not true.  The evidence has been presented numerous times that the flushes are quackery.  You have yet to supply even a shred of evidence that what people are passing are real gallstones.  Why is that?  You don't have any evidence?  You are hoping that if you get me to respond enough that the evidence will get buried in the thread?  You are trying to wear me down so I will go away?  You just like playing childish games?  Really, I would like to hear your answer as to why you have totally ignored the indisputable evidence that has been presented while refusing to provide any real evidence to the contrary to back your claims.  And why do you keep asking the same questions over and over that I have already answered?  Did you simply not understand the answers?  Or did you simply refuse to look at them just like you have refused to look at all the solid evidence that I presented that the flushes are quackery?  Which is it?