Re: Sure, why do it unless you need to.

 I DID HAVE A CT SCAN SHOW POSITIVE Gallstones THEN DID A FLUSH AND ANOTHER CT ABOUT A MONTH LATER SHOWED NO GALLSTONES. I HAVE THE REPORT SOMEWHERE TO SHOW IT. THE FLUSH DOES WORK AND IT CLEANED MY GB CLEAN OUT TOO SO IT CAN NOT BE SAID THAT STONES CAN NOT BE PASSED.

This is a great example of what I keep saying about people making unfounded claims because they do not understand how the body works.  I have actually addressed this in the past.  These scans CANNOT differentiate between real stones and sludge in the gallbladder.  This is because the shadowing from the sludge appears the same as gallstones on the scan.  The large doses of oil will contract the gallbladder helping to eliminate the sludge that appears like stones on the scan.  Yet stones are not passed because they never existed in the first place.  Research it.

On the other hand Spud did an interesting experiment she reported here.  First she had a scan, which verified that she had NO gallstones.  Then she did the "liver flush" and passed those green blobs that people keep incorrectly claiming are gallstones.  Now there is some solid evidence that these "liver flushes" are bogus and that the so-called "stones" are formed in the intestines, not the gallbladder.  Of course this has also been confirmed a number of times by lab analysis that these "stones" are saponified fats.  In fact the ONLY lab report I have seen posted on CZ that claimed that the blobs were actually gallstones was shown to have been faked.  So why can't the "liver flush" supporters come up with any real evidence these are gallstones?  Oh, that's right, because they are not real gallstones.