Re: we are doctors. trust us.

>>I see far too much evidence of intent to cause harm, as opposed to blind negligence in pursuit of greed.<<

Find the intent in the 1820's or 1860's examples I gave for anything but *profits*... same thing in the initial stages of the GM industries. I would argue that the initial *intent* was profit\greed.

This is from where these *conspiracy theories* are born.... usually *after* the start of disinformation campaigns and efforts to limit industry liabilities.

>>there has been a campaign since recorded history to keep the human race week...<<

Absolutely... the Bible, as other religious texts such as the Quran, have been, and are used towards that end.

>>and yes, some of us get hit much much harder than others. Things like chemtrails and lyme disease are not negligence.<<

Hard to prove one way or the other... for instance, if chemtrails are attempts to control weather, protect the earth from *what-have-you*, there could be several rather logical steps of progression that would show not more than negligence.

Lyme disease may, or may not be man-made... hard to prove that too... it may have been inevitable through our global chemical and GM assult of this planet... these things, along with EM, etc. pollution affect not only genetics but things like prion structure, etc.

Isn't mad cow disease a prion deformation? Could the people who contributed to containment livestock practices in the 1820's have foreseen this when they had no idea what a prion was? And until very recently (within the last few years), thought that they were not a *living* thing and thus unalterable?

>>they cost money to carry out, and can serve no purpose other than to intentionally cause harm. vaccination is another one. those that force it on us know full well that it is harmful. profit is just the icing on the cake, not the true purpose. i could go on and on...<<

Again the *vaccine* industry was created as part of pharmmedico long before they could have possibly understood the full repercussions... heck, the double helix was not even known for decades after the fact.

>>perhaps grz you just don't want to think that some of our human brothers would intentionally harm for the sole purpose of maintaining power... but when you really think about it, the conclusion seems hard to dismiss.<<

Like I have stated... I believe *most*, but not all, of these things started with primarily a solution to a problem - a man-made problem in most cases, that was not even understood as such, but a problem just the same - while reaping a profit intent.

After that, once the damage being caused was realized, the industries were far too big in terms of economic contribution in jobs, profit, taxes, etc., and then the industries went into damage control mode and sought only to protect themselves from liability... and that THESE actions are what then spawns conspiracy theories... well after the business has been established.

And yes, there are EVIL people in this world that once these things became understood, may have put them to use for their own evil intents - depopulation agendas, etc... intentionally expanding the *damage* being done... but in the initial stages of these industries... given the chronological order of events, I find it hard to believe that they understood these things... for the most part, I am certain that they did not.

grz-

Tweet