Re: LoL HV rampaging

 

If you are just going to come back here just to act like a jerk again DON'T!!! 

During the course of this study, 1.000 mg iodine per day was administered to 14 children 1 to 11 years old for approximately 3 months without encountering any toxic effects.  

 

 

One milligram is not even close to an excess. Pay attention to what was said in the thread. 

 

. As of the latest reports in 1978, the study concerning the iodinated water supply at a prison (53,153-156) had been ongoing for 15 years. During this time, 750 men and women had ingested approximately 1 to 2 mg iodine per day from the water supply for various periods with no change in serum thyroxine and few side effects (156). One hundred seventy-seven women who were incarcerated at this prison had given birth to 181 infants without evidence of adverse effects in the infants (155). It was, however, noted that four women who were hyperthyroid before entering became more symptomatic while consuming the iodinated water supply, and that of 15 inmates tested, two had impaired organic formation of thyroidal iodine (53). 

 

Again one to two milligrams is not an excess. And if you read your own link it says from the "water supply". If this water supply contains other halogens such as chlorine or fluorine these will displace the iodine, which can easily account for the lack of increase in serum thyroxine. Also note that there were side effects from these low doses. Why don't you look up what those were and post those so people are aware that iodine can have adverse effects?

 

 iodine4health.com/research/pennington_1990_review_iodine_toxicity.pdf

 

Glad to see you are posting some of the potential adverse effects of too much iodine. From your link:

 

"Excessive iodine in the body may cause thyroiditis (inflammation of the

thyroid gland); goiter, the enlargement of the thyroid gland; abnormal increases or

decreases in thyroid hormone levels; sensitivity reactions; or acute toxicity. Absorption of

high levels of iodine (particularly from medications such as Lugol's solution or asthma

medications) by the mother during pregnancy or breastfeeding may harm the health of

the infant; such cases are reviewed. The inability to tolerate excess iodine, and the

relationship between dose of iodine and response are discussed. Although some

persons can tolerate very high levels of iodine without developing toxic effects, some

individuals develop problems when absorbing only 1 milligram per day or less. This is the

exception, however, and 1 milligram/day is probably safe for most individuals."

 

 

 

Servus Mariusz

 

Comparison of urinary bromide levels among people in East Asia, and the effects of dietary intakes of cereals and marine products.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12191890

 

And this has what to do with what is being talked about? We are not discussing urinary excretion of bromine that people in Asian counties are ingesting from seaweeds and seafoods. Again pay attention to the thread.

 

Iodine allergy' is not an accurate label for patients who have had allergic reactions to iodinated radiological contrast media or iodinated antiseptics. Allergy to seafood has nothing to do with iodine content as it is caused by specific immunoglobulin E to proteins. Seafood allergy is not a specific risk factor for reactivity to iodinated radiological contrast media, but a history of any moderate or severe allergic disorder confers a slight increase in risk. Patients with a previous history of allergy to radiological contrast media are at highest risk of a reaction. In some cases the risk of an allergic reaction to contrast media can be reduced by premedication, but, if previous reactions were severe, contrast media will usually remain contraindicated.

Same as above. NOBODY mentioned ANYTHING about iodine allergies. So why are you even bringing this up when it has NOTHING to do with the thread?!!!
 

www.australianprescriber.com/magazine/32/5/125/8/

 

Tweet