Moderating(Bias)

"Before casting more judgement, I suggest you take a closer look at your own shadows and motivations for posting. You playing the part of Victim is surreal. "

The irony that is seen when placing the 2 bolded texts together is almost comedic. My motivation is to expose agendas and to look at devisive tactics which you brought up btw. ;-) And to do so, without new age maneuvering to cloud the issues.


"Yes, I did give Turiya the R's on her post, simply because I thought it brilliant.

And I R'd my own post because a poster (not Turiya) had hit the R alert button for it, just like you hit the alert button for posts you have enjoyed.

And I moderate many forums on Curezone, even the ones I never post on and even the ones I have no interest on. Moderating does not take time, but posting does. It is easy to moderate with a few minutes to spare even on busy days."

I am far from a victim as you are are labeling me as. A victim would just say "oh well, it is what it is...love and light." You seem to be using new age terms in a convenient fashion for more maneuvering.

Now let's go further and see where this takes us. Beyond the cloud cover. Lets shine a bit more light into the shadows so to speak.

You are saying that you were just moderating when you chose to R your own message. You are communicating that it was just the dutiful thing to do (R your own post).

My intuition being as sensitive as it is was saying there was more to this story and upon further investigation, behold, there was.

Another email to Solus and my question was answered. My intuition validated. I was informed that literally, just below your message on the moderation log was another message that could have been given an R. In other words, the line below where your message was signaled to be given an R, there was another one also signaled to be given an R. Right below...almost touching. ;-)

The thing that made this message different than the one's you were handing out 'R's to, is that this particular message had an opposing view point to what you were airing. So now we see a new picture forming as to why that particular message was left off the R'ing "moderation duties." Journalistic integrity missing.

You seem to be painting a different picture in the open to what the facts are in the shadows and even going so far as saying I am a victim in the process, while in the same sentence, suggesting I am "casting more judgment."

Recap.

You say things that are not in alignment with your actions.
There seems to be an agenda emerging, based on both my intuition and what is coming to light here. We all have agendas with our filters but the difference is you are using moderation power to wield yours.

Do you seriously not admit to, or see your bias at this point? Will you just hide under more new age cover ups and run away from this?

As far as the choice (vegan vs meat eating) thing goes, yes in a model of infinite potential all choices are available but somehow clubbing a person over the head may not be an optimal choice, at least for the one being clubbed. (If someone were to attempt that with me they would soon find out I am not a victim. ;-)) I will comment on this more in a separate post. I don't want to confuse the two issues going on here. One is about moderating and bias well another is about something else.

"I am not without fault or bias, (is anyone?) but I will attempt to own mine and seek to make corrections and find balance when I am made aware of them. So thank you for bringing your thoughts to my attention and I will inquire more deeply into them and see if I fit your notion of me."

You're welcome.





Tweet