Edited

I answered the question. YOur children are not citizens by birthright if their mother was not a citizen, though they have permanent residency through you. JUst as the personal income tax is unconstitutional and the drug laws are also constitutional. IF you just want to ignore the constitution then you are like the NWO elites who simply buy the laws they want and ignore the laws they dont like.

Your children should vote for someone who is against birthright citizenship since it is a disastrous policy that encourages illegal immigration. Why would YOU want to encourage illegal immigration? IS that a racist position based on personal motives?

Birthright citizenship is a unconstitutional POLICY of the NWO elites that made it easier for them to acquire their slaves. It never existed for legal immigrants who were not permanent residents and especially not for illegal ones in the constitution.

I am not a big RP supporter. To me he is an anarchist capitalist. However he is far better for America than any other candidate.

Now you can answer my other questions. And Do you speak fluent Spanish?













A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw man argument" is to describe a position that superficially resembles an opponent's actual view but is easier to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent (for example, deliberately overstating the opponent's position).[1] A straw man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it carries little or no real evidential weight, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted.[2]

Its name is derived from the practice of using straw men in combat training.[citation needed] In such training, a scarecrow is made in the image of the enemy with the single intent of attacking it[3].[not in citation given] Such a target is, naturally, immobile and does not fight back, and is not as realistic to test skill against compared to a live and armed opponent. It is occasionally called a straw person argument,[4] straw dog fallacy, scarecrow argument, or wooden dummy argument.[