I see you have admitted defeat again, in the roundabout way you do. Lacking any evidence to support you position now you try to change the subject. It is a cowardly way of admitting defeat, though I guess you are sparing your ego by refusing to admit you have no facts.
Like an immature child that is always looking for the acceptance of his peers you focus on the votes. Like a man who can stand on his own two feet I focus on the facts. Popularity is not the same as accuracy, at your age you have not learned that, there is little hope for you. Science is not a democracy, you cannot vote on the mass of an electron, or take a poll to see if a drug works. Those things are measured on the weight of the evidence – evidence you sorely lack.
Your rantings remind me of something Roger M. Wilcox wrote about Reich another quack with a faithful following. It fits you just as well:
“… [he] was not willing to stand upon the shoulders of giants. He stood only as high as his own experiences would allow, and from this low perch imagined himself to be a lone eagle soaring higher than any other man had ever reached.”
It is like he met you. It is you to a tee. From the delusions of grandeur and the imaginary foes, Don Quixote indeed – well chosen. Are there some more windmills you should be attacking thinking they are giants?
You keep repeating the same things about parroting company line, but you also fail to come up with the studies that will prove you right that most natural medicines work most of the time. But we both know that most studies point to the opposite. So instead you choose (for the third time) to turn this into a personal battle. Corinthian 3 : Knight Errant 0
Thinking that a persons bio matters in a discussion of facts is foolish. A persons identity is at issue if they present themselves as the researcher. If they make their arguments from authority then their credentials are in play. When they are offering the works of other experts, then they are not part of the discussion.
Your insistence on finding out my background tells us you are not a competent debater, you lack focus, facts and you are prone to ad hominem attacks. You have incompetence written all over you.
All we have to do is click on the link below
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=899337#i
and it is clear that you began the personal attacks. The mod caved in to mob rule rather than just follow rules. You keep repeating the same lie, it won’t make it come true, but truth has never been a major concern for you. Votes are what you crave; it is what you need to feed the emptiness. The reasons for repeating the same line ad nauseum is that you hope that repeating the lie often enough will cause people to assume it is true. You are the Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf of curezone?
"In an age of spin, al-Sahaf offers feeling and authenticity. His message is consistent -- unshakeable, in fact, no matter the evidence -- but he commands daily attention by his on-the-spot, invective-rich variations on the theme. His lunatic counterfactual art is more appealing than the banal awfulness of the Reliable Sources. He is a Method actor in a production that will close in a couple of days. He stands superior to truth."
-- Jean-Pierre McGarrigle
Your presence here is a danger to those who would follow your advice. You make claims you can’t back up, often claims that have long been debunked. In the face of such evidence you pout and hold your breath as if that could change the facts. Like the character after you have named yourself you live in a fantasy world, facts are not tolerated if they conflict with your fantasies. You are forever in search of imaginary quests, forever creating imaginary enemies. Tilting at windmills like a wannabe hero.
In your moronic attempt to distract, you continue to harp on matters that are not related to the subject of whether you can present evidence or not. My own biographical information will not prevent you from finding studies to back up your claims that most natural cures are effective. You have been given plenty of chances to realize how truly stupid your demand are, you have been given explanations why it is irrelevant. It must be beyond your intellectual capacity because you keep at it. We both know it is a cheap tactic, when I ask for the studies you come back with your demand about my bio – an honest person would simply say that they had no evidence and not try to distract with idiotic demands.
So, it is nice to see a plug. By creating a hostile environment towards modern medicine you ensure greater sales. You target the sick, you are profiting from human suffering so it is in your best interest to keep that river of suffering flowing – your wealth depends on it. Facts would cut into your profits; your strong aversion to them is understandable.
You cannot expect a man to admit to a lie when his livelihood depends on that lie.
DQ, Pobre viejo loco. Espero que un dia encuentres la razon.