Why rice?

parasites and infection were a much bigger problem in earlier times.

Pork is a common no, no in religions.

From what I’ve read, religions always seem to include a component of awareness about what were “common” health issues “at the time”.

Most are no longer valid.

The removal of the man’s foreskin was for cleanliness issues.

Even though the risk of disfigurement or “usability” and infection were at a much higher risk “at that time”.

Did you know that foreskin removal causes a “lack” of sensitivity and therefore induces a predilection towards oral sex to compensate?

My step father died at 96 (death by hospital) always had a preference for enjoying a pork meal. He said it was easier on the digestion.

Looking at other societies is invalid without looking at the whole context of the diet along with genetic development.

I seem to recall those races whose primary starch is rice have several feet more intestine to absorb the minute nutrients.

The best thing to do is look at the number of “old” people, how nimble they are and how “they” look.

While some of course is gene related, you’ll fine that if the acclimated diet is bad, the long term affect on their beauty, is awful!


Just an opinion of course.

Savagegrace