Re: Dr. Jarvis and David Brownstein, M.D
When one thinks about it all, the timing is just too coincidental; with all the patents waiting in the wings...
Your comments are apropos.
While I would praise and thank these doctors and their collective work, it is hard to really know what machine is behind them. One always has to ask why? Unfortunately the why, even here, is most often profit and/or recognition/power motivated. With the conferences and public speaking engagements, more will come to know. It is ramping up.
Keep close tabs on the Federal Register and law changes as it applies to
Iodine and available sources. Keep an eye on patents and patent introduction as
Iodine availability fades.
This will most likely play out over years...
We could watch the whole thing as it is played and understand it better from the front row.
I pray and hope I am wrong... after going through the patents, paying attention to this whole thing, and it having been played out before with a once available supplement or two the writing seems to be on the wall.
All they need to wipe out
Iodine from public access is a few very public injuries or deaths (they could manipulate the public exposure and even conjure up the injuries/deaths) as happened with L-Tryptophan years ago, which has since come back on the market as the whole thing was exposed as a sham to introduce prozac.
You know as well as I do that you choose... one or the other, pharmedico or the way God intended. Mixing and matching seems to cause more issues than not. MH would tell you that, so would others.