yes, the dr testified to the insurance company and the guy won. it is possible, because it happened. there would be no legal precedent. no laws made the insurance company decide to replace the fillings. it was the guy who had the mercury fillings and dr radzik who made the insurance company change their minds. you keep calling me a liar and you keep bringing law into. it was a little town in oregon, a private insurance company, a guy and his dr. that dr happens to be the same dr i had when i was diagnosed (by him) with mercury and nickel poisoning. he told me this story himself, as he had just testifed (gave his professional knowledge as a dr) to his patient's insurance company. the guy's insurance paid for the removal and he does not not have mercury fillings any longer. why do you keep saying i am lying when it was what the dr told me? if the dr did not tell me, i would have no knowledge of it. and, you cannot call the dr's office and speak to some woman and find this out. it was years ago and the only way to find out is ask the dr himself. you are making a huge deal out of it, though. you seem to be focused on law and legalities. again, this was a private insurance company that decided to replace the fillings based on what the dr and the patient said. nothing more, nothing less.