Re: That's an interesting question

i saw the post by shelly you are referring too. it wasn't an attempt to save anyone from dangerous advice. she disagreed with the forum owner, nothing more, nothing less. and to be honest, I disagreed with her opinion. in such a case no one is really right or wrong, and therefore, endless debates just clutter the forum. better for a debate forum. It keeps people who enjoy disruption from ruining forums that were not designed for debate. and it apparently robs you of something you feel compelled to do, that is contradict approaches advocated by others. because this gets disruptive, it looks like you are apparently stuck in the Debate Forums .

and by the way, i check-out some of your posts in the liverflushing debate forum. and i understand why you have a problem with some individuals and their relationship with the flush. I'm follower of Hulda Clark , and thank that zappers are a waste of $$$. But, she didn't invent the flush, and the flush will outlast her.

re your theory of bile/oil combining to make the stones, the theory fails to explain why people eventually stop getting stones. we still produce bile... and the oil is still present... but no stones... I didn't get any stones on flush no. 17 and now believe I am clean, at least for now. I do hope you can find a real way to test your theory though, because I am confident that it will show that Liver Flushing removes stones from the liver and gb.

John g