"should work", the operative word is "should", but that is not always the case, such as with the Fscan verses the F165. The F165, for example, is more effective in treatment for a few reasons, one of which is due to a higher voltage output, and far more capable software programming. For example, a simple zapper will be useless against nanobacteria, which requires frequency specific generation for eliminating this. I know not only from Dr. Jeffery Sutherland, but from FIRST hand experience and witness of the RESULTS of this frequency specific targeting of nanobacteria, and it's subsequent immediate elimination and it's affects. This nanobacteria frequency therapy or "zapping" ie. specific frequency treatment is ESSENTIAL to a STRONGER immune system, having a multiplicative effect of 4x to immunity. Regular use of a zapper, which I did initially before doing more frequency specific targeting of pathogens & parasites, DID NOT WORK against nanobacteria, etc. WHY would Dr. Clark put the frequencies in tables, charts, and lists in her books??? Because if one is to get SERIOUS about parasite elimination, they need a frequency generator in MOST cases. I think Dr. Clark's work proves this overwhelmingly, as does Dr. Sutherland's, and MY OWN PERSONAL experience.
Certified ScrumMaster Training and Inventor of the Agile Scrum Process
Microsoft Business Framework Advisory Council
Object Management Group/HL7 Liaison Committee
Co-Chair, HL7 Orders and Observations Technical Committee
Co-Investigator, Operating Room of the Future, Univ. of Maryland Medical System