The comment refering to Bush as a "born-again Christian" was relating to his coming to God, falling from God and then coming to God again and not the denomination (if there is one? Ive heard of risen again...). John 3:3 is speaking of being born-again through baptism of the Holy Spirit (ie faith in Jesus) - this is what a family friend of Bush supposedly claimed he was experiencing for a second time - this is what I doubt.
From your previous post:
"I belive that it would be a gross mistake for George Bush to claim he is a Born again Christian. The terminology does not fit him. Professing Christian, or some denominational christian or something else is ok but a claim of being a Born again Christian means that the very same life of the awsome lord Jesus Christ now flows in Bush is a lie and all christians living by the Holy spirit would agree without much discussion."
Here you are calling Bush a liar (which might very well be so). My point was, especially seeing this info is speculative, that I thought it was a bad idea to speak evil of our rulers (see preious post).