Re: Anyone have any idea what these are? [plus some random thoughts]

Hello again.



Re:

"..cancer is an end product of a chronic degenerative process on mulitple levels, including immune dysfuntion, chronic physical damage and accumulated genetic dysregulation. The issue is quite complex, in so much that once the damage is done it is quite difficult then to stop the process or reverse the extensive damage as opposed to preventing it or catching in much ealier stages."




It's a quite difficult process to reverse, granted, but it can be done. I'm convinced of it. As I mentioned before, I may have done it myself, however difficult that is to prove, but I'm willing to put my TRUTHS to the test anytime, anywhere. I've also heard of others do it successfully, and as far as I have been able to observe many of those 'others' appear to be "believable", credible and logical enough to consider their results as 'at least' possible.

For the time being, I'M SURE that Cancer can be eliminated with a protocol. It seems apparent that no single substance can kill Cancer on its own, at least so far, but with a rigorous protocol, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that it can be done.








Re:

"An interesting note is that some parasitic infestations are actually called "metastatic" as with cancer and are staged by the same criteria, whether primary and the extent of spread to other organs or lymph nodes etc."

Would you please point out some references?
Also, do you have any references to the "colombia and japan riddle"?










Re:

"I think its also important to mention however; I dont necesarrily believe as Hulda does that parasites are involved in every case of cancer, as clearly many different etiologies are possible and sometimes multiple, such as toxins, radiation, chronic inflammation, viruses, and yes occasionally even genetic."

I often wonder if perhaps she knows something we don't. Does she have any references to back her arguments? Do you know of any? [As a rule, I never discard any argument without considering it first, no matter how "irrational" it may appear to be.]

I know for a fact that parasites appear to be responsible for "host immune modulation".










Re:

"Another interesting thought is the chemo regimens they use to fight these cancers are often based on drugs which are toxic to rapidly growing cells such as cancer, but also affecting hair and GI tract cells and probably parasites as well. Something to think about."

My knowledge of "chemo" regimens is very limited, but I have read many times that they kill "cancer cells" along with healthy ones. I've also read that they themselves have Cancer listed as a side effect, which means they "may" produce Cancer as well. I think I remember hearing that patients undergoing chemo are required to sign some kind of form more or less along the lines of an "experimentation agreement", in other words, required to sign off as "guinea pigs" of sorts. I do not know how true this last comment is.









Re:

"As far as docs, Im sure there have been more than a couple question the orthodox views but to verbalize that is professional suicide with many ethical, social and legal ramifications, including loss of medical licensure, as well as being ostracized (sp)."

And that's where my definition of "REAL MEN" comes in.
A line must be drawn, I think.

Tell it all to this Doctor in Kansas (I think), which as I read successfully treated a child with advanced leukemia by merely looking under the microscope and prescribing according to what he found. Although the child recovered fully, they closed down his clinic and God knows what else they did to him. Ever heard of it? I'm trying to find a reference to this story but so far haven't been lucky. Anyone?