Re: ANSWERS

First, I appologize for getting at you the way I did. I know I didn't reply in a sensitive manner, and I'm sorry. My reply to your reply was posted on 3 am in the morning...enough said, haha.

On a different level of "rhetoric," let me just say that it seems like you've taken a liking for these other products [prill beads and miracle2] not only because of the "pennies on the dollar" issue but ofcourse because you saw results--the "judge by the results" issue--and that is why you would even mention a recommendation of those products to anyone (although you should seriously reconsider the Miracle 2 products, lol). Now that's the "apple to apple," comparison. We both have the ability to judge by the results. And I understand you find the conventional sauna to be more enjoyable because you have access to a spa club, and that is fine. But please do not dismiss the FIR (Far-Infrared-Sauna) technology on that basis alone.

Yes, you are correct. I was comparing "apples to oranges." In the sense that comparing FIR (Far-Infrared-Sauna) to the Sauna is like comparing apples to oranges. They operate in different levels. Sauna heats the air. FIR (Far-Infrared-Sauna) penetrates the body. Although, like apples and oranges, they are both good for your health. But, hey, there's research out there that says the apple is better than the orange because of it's ability to soften liver stones . I've used the FIR technology, and I personally think it's great and there are research out there that says FIR is better than a conventional sauna. But I see your point about the research coming from FIR sellers. Everyone says something good about their own product. But, unless the info is all false, then don't you agree the FIR not only stands alone in its kind but is quite revolutionary?

But ofcourse we are all entitled to our own oppinion. But I am glad you are going to do some research. I am very interested in seeing what you can find. Best of luck to you. :)

Cheers,
Marvin

Tweet