Re: Maryland moves closer to allowing homosexual marriage

your post is nothing but fast-talk for "legislating-from-the-bench" You say the judge vetoed the legislation, but actually he/she/it/they are not vetoing legislation, but a basic definition: Marriage, by DEFINITION, is a union between a man and woman. And this judge is single-handedly throwing the whole concept -- and definition -- out the window -- without voter's approval!

What would you think if some nutball judge woke up one day and decided we should allow sisters and brothers to marry? Who's to say it's not THEIR RIGHT? In this country, the PEOPLE should decide, not a judge.