Yes, I think that (mis)representation is pretty much universal. Anything that subverts the original message has a certain mischievous appeal, does it not? Trapper is just an extreme example of the same theme.
An interesting survey of the serpent seed theory, but I was referring specifically to 2 Cor. 11:2-3 (which I cited in an earlier post), and trapper's delusional & triumphalist claims that it supports his hellish doctrines. I was simply wondering/enquiring if any of you knew why his interpretation cannot withstand close scrutiny?