Re: Zapper proof of efficacy

Ok let see what are the facts and what are the repeated unjustified informations :

[quote]
Royal Rife found that the death rate in milliamperes is 175 DC for the cancer virus.
[/quote]
Ok good start, you confuse voltage and intensity
But not a big deal, what is the source ? Royal Rife is dead a long time ago, how do you know that this information is genuine ? Even it is genuine, what are the others properties of the electric signal or electromagnetic field or electromagnetic wave ? How was it delivered to the target ?

[quote]
The Kaali and Lyman patent, so often mentioned in conjunction with zappers, used as little as 50 milliamperes to cause the hiv virus not to be able to infect new healthy cells.
[/quote]
And you think that with a maximum allowed intensity of 9mA (parazapper devices) applied on the skin (not in the blood) you will manage to produce the same effect ?
Let's assume that a zapper with a sharp square wave and only positive offset (for an unjustified reason ?), and a high enough intensity, and a "good" frequency, manages to kill small single cell organisms like viruses, bacterias, protozoas, does this mean that it can also kill big multi cells organisms (animals) like parasitic worms ? No.

[quote]
The real limitation on zappers is getting the electricity to the areas of the body where most pathogens hide.
[/quote]
And actually managing to kill the pathogens if the pathogens are multi cells organisms which can repair their body.

[quote]
Those areas typically have the highest electrical resistance so the electrical current goes around those areas. But even so, zappers will work against the "critters" that pass by their current, so many hours of zapper use can really help reduce the pathogens in the body.
[/quote]
I have not found that an electric signal even with an allowed intensity as high as 35mA with 4 electrodes managed to kill big adult worms. They just seem disturbed and move to areas of the body where there is less conductibity/more resistance (the stomach, the oesophagus, the small intestine, the colon, the sinuses, the head !)

[quote]
A major area of toxins and microbes is the colon, so anti-microbial cleanses will get those toxins and parasites out since a zapper will likely not reach those areas.
[/quote]
Words, unfortunately this is not as easy.

[quote]
but that does not mean a that a DC style zapper with 100% positive offset might not work if used for many hours a day.
[/quote]
Maybe it will help to kill viruses, maybe not. When i critic the claims of parzapper, it is because he uses the word "parasites" to mean "parasitic protozoas" and this is confusing because "parasites" also mean "parasitic worms". And to be clear, parzapper has not shown any objective proofs that his zapper manages to damage/kill parasitic worms.

[quote]
The Beck style zapper will greatly increase energy levels although, by allowing for better atp transfer by unclumping the blood cells.
[/quote]
What is your proof of that ?

[quote]
From my understanding of 100% positive offset, it will short out the positively charged microbes and parasites and at the same time act an electron donor for negatively charges white blood cells.
[/quote]
Don croft has the same theory on his website.
Whatever the mechanism, what i want to see is objective proofs of dead parasitic worms in the feces, in the urine, in the phlegm, in the blood and after all these years and thousands of devices sold all over the world, nobody has provided any objective proof. How strange is that ?

I have done many experiments on my side (read my previous posts if you are interested) with different frequencies (even with the frequencies of the specific parasitic worms mentionned by HC), with a higher voltage and higher allowed intensity (up to 25ma with 2 electrodes, up to 35ma with 4 electrodes) but i have not found that an electric signal with the properties mentionned by HC produced significant die of of parasitic worms.


[quote]
Para zappers do have some excellent features not found elsewhere. Constant current, 100% positive offset and many of the commonly used frequencies.
[/quote]
Any feature is useless if it does not produce die off. Zappers makers/sellers compete on features more than on objective proofs of die of or parasitic worms, how strange is that ? Tweet