CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Zapper proof of efficacy
 
parazapper Views: 6,330
Published: 11 y
 
This is a reply to # 2,188,229

Re: Zapper proof of efficacy


>- Parazapper can't show any proof,

Actually, Beck does not work as well as the new ParaZapper multi-frequency units and there is visible proof that anyone can do ( except Beck ). As I challenged you in the past, do the jar test.

>- Parazapper deceptively uses the word "parasite". He knows people think "worms"

No, this is a lie. Just because some people only think worms, that does not make it so. Look up the true definition.

On top of that, read back through the old posts on the Zapper Support Forum . There are successes.

>- And for his information the feds can use thing he has ever said or wrote making any type of claim that his devices treat diseases

Since their previous efforts, including failures to get grand juries to indict, have not been successful, I doubt that there is much of the old stuff that is of benefit to them in this respect. At least that is what my attorneys have told me.

>- I know the subject better than anyone

I am not so sure that is true.

I do not make any medical claims for the new products that we currently sell. The only claim that I have made in regards to these new products is that they are better at killing microbes than any other zapper available.

If any zapper can not effectively kill microbes in a simple water environment, they are certainly not likely to kill microbes in a more complex environment.

 

Share


 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2025  www.curezone.org

0.218 sec, (1)