Re: Zapper proof of efficacy

[quote]
There are many important factors such as slew rate, maximum bandwidth, output impedance, etc that make a difference.
[/quote]
Slew rates are good on many zappers.
Maximum bandwidth i have no idea what this means.
Output impedance has to be taken into consideration only if your electrodes/skin is not wet enough.
And the 2 last parameters are not important, you claim they are important, without any proof or reasonable explanations, it is only a way to position yourself to try to impress potential buyers.
Again stop trying to distort reality, it makes you look bad.

[quote]
Not one of the zappers that you tried has CC technology.
[/quote]
Another arbitrary requirement made by you, i have not noticed more die off with a intensity 3.333 higher than yours.

[quote]
Why are there so few studies when the ones that have been done are successful? Why has the scientific world not done additional studies on other organisms such as helminths?
[/quote]
Good observation, i agree.

My guess is that if there would be some money to earn to study the effects of electric signals on the human body and on parasitic worms, there would be interested researchers.

My critic to you is that, as a zapper producer, you have the responsibility to be honest about what your device can or cannot do and you should not keep trying to convert more desperate infected people to buy your device by spreading distortions, exaggerations, omissions, inaccuracies.
Also i expect that you use at least a small part of the money that you earn to continue to make experiments and to present your experiments and your results.
After all these years, what have you shown us ? Not much.
If you cannot do that, to me it means that you are here not to help infected people but above all to make money by deceiving infected people.

I have invested a lot of money in different devices and custom devices and i have stopped my experiments because the results were not good enough. Feeling less pain/discomfort is not a good enough argument since we know that our nervous system uses electric signals to communicate and that an alteration of these signals can probably alter our sensations. But this does not remove the problem : the harmful organism, and especially parasitic worms which can trick the immune system.

I think that the only thing that must be taken into account is visible dead adult worms and dead larvaes evacuated in the feces/phlegm/urine.
And of course using only one treatment at a time. (contrary to the biased experiment you mention.
Now after all these years, where are the photos ? Where are the videos ? Where are the detailed descriptions of the experiments and the results. Nothing. Or please show me. Show us. Tweet