Re: Question and challenge

The figures are for bacteria at optimum conditions, 98 degrees F, unlimited food supply, sufficient moisture, salinity, etc.

The only impediment in the case of septicemia is a working immune system and medical intervention, anti-biotics, etc. The problem is, in cases of septicemia, that the microbes multiply much faster than the immune system can eliminate them. The best hope is that the microbe is not resistant to Antibiotics .

If the microbes are resistant to Antibiotics , then a device that can quickly kill microbes in an aqueous environment may actually be the best hope or even the only hope for survival.

If the septicemia is so bad that there is even a 1 percent increase in the first 20 minutes, within only a few hours, there will be a 10 percent increase. The microbial overgrowth is beyond the resources of the immune system. Fever starts to rage at 104 to 105 degrees. The immune system is so frantic that it is dumping peroxide everywhere, inflammation is rampant, and organs are starting to fail. At this point, while killing the microbes may stop the infection, systemic collapse is almost inevitable.

I have had experience with Beck, Rife, Clark, and a number of other electro-therapy techniques. At this point in time, If I was faced with a MRSA infection, or any other Antibiotic resistant infection, the first thing that I would run for is one of the multiple frequency output zappers that I know can kill almost all microbes in a short time.

If you or anyone can provide a side by side comparison that demonstrates anything that produces better results, then I am on board. Is this not what we are seeking? To find the best way to produce the best results?

The reason for my challenge is to show that this is an improvement in technology. I am certain that it is not the end-of-all or the final answer, only visible progress.
Tweet