CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Why is Cutler so against supplemental glutathione?
  Views: 24,749
Published: 12 years ago
This is a reply to # 1,822,369

Re: Why is Cutler so against supplemental glutathione?

"Remember that for Cutler, redistribution of Hg to more vulnerable parts of the body is enemy #1."

Then I guess he chooses to ignore studies that show lipoic acid does just that.

As Powertool and others have said above, his logic just DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. Glutathione does indeed help the body remove heavy metals, pesticides, and other toxins. There are multiple studies out there to prove that, but Cutler has none to disprove it, except perhaps some snide comment if you don't happen to agree with him.
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2023

1.078 sec, (1)