CureZone   Log On   Join
Why is Cutler so against supplemental glutathione?
missthang Views: 26,239
Published: 12 years ago

Why is Cutler so against supplemental glutathione?

I've been reading posts here for months and have also read Andy Cutler's book on Amalgam illness and I've learned a lot.

One thing I don't understand, however, is why he's so against supplemental glutathione? The only thing I really gathered from his book was that oral supplemtation of GSH wasn't effective, but since there are now liposomal forms and suppositories (which would, theoretically, be more effective in getting absorbed properly), I don't understand why he's so against it.

In one post on the Yahoo group, he said that about half the people who get GSH IV's actually get much worse, which doesn't make sense to me since GSH is the body's chief way of eliminating toxins.

Could someone explain why extra GSH would be bad? I'm getting my fillings out over the next 2 weeks and want to have all my supplies ready for chelation...

Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2023

0.969 sec, (1)