Read again - the ASCO report WAS about human patients

Amazing - you post a link to the actual ASCO report:

http://www.nerium.com/Journals/2009%20SIO%20Annual%20Meeting.pdf

and obviously did not bother to read the report, which was clearly about actual human patients - as anyone here who goes to the link can clearly see.  Instead you gleefully pounced on background items in the introduction to the report and again posted about a previous toxicity only study of limited duration whose sole purpose was to determine maximum doseage of a different oleander medicine.

Discounting all of the thousands of people who have successfully used oleander (many tens of thousands when you include HIV), how do you explain the case reports I posted links to and which you keep ignoring?

I challenge you to find one single instance where I had a post removed which was not removed as a result of either being in a thread or being an answer to a post you made which was targeted for removal.  Likewise the PM you refer to is obviously the one YOU received, which was the first one sent.  Like the removed posts, it was YOU who caused the PM to be sent, as the message I actually received made quite clear.

What would you consider your above post to be, btw?  You have made it abundantly clear that you have a vendetta against me, and we both know that the truth is because I dared disagree with you.  Now, stop all the attacking and obsessing and let it go before yet another thread you hijacked gets moved from a support forum to a debate forum.